SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 issue2Comparison between tenecteplase and alteplase in intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Related links

Share


Revista Médica del Uruguay

Print version ISSN 0303-3295On-line version ISSN 1688-0390

Abstract

VIROGA, Stephanie et al. Reproductive justice in Uruguay Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in the Integrated National Health System. Rev. Méd. Urug. [online]. 2024, vol.40, n.2, e201.  Epub June 01, 2024. ISSN 0303-3295.  https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.40.2.1.

Introduction:

Reproductive justice is the ability of individuals and societies to realize sexual and reproductive rights. On the contrary, reproductive injustice (RI) exposes the presence of risks to the developmental process during pregnancy and early childhood.

Objective:

To describe the evolution of a set of indicators related to reproductive justice in the Integrated National Health System (SNIS) of Uruguay over the last 12 years and compare trends between the public and private subsectors.

Methodology:

A descriptive, retrospective study of a set of indicators included in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and national health objectives was conducted. Maternal mortality ratio (MMR), incidence of preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and congenital syphilis (CS) were analyzed in the public and private subsectors of the SNIS over the past 12 years.

Results:

During the analyzed period the maternal mortality ratio has always been higher in the public subsector, except in the year 2015. The incidence of preterm birth during the period has ranged between 8.6% and 10%. It is higher in the public subsector, except in some periods where it is higher in the private subsector. The incidence of low birth weight is always higher in the public subsector, with its highest incidence in 2022 at 9.3. Congenital syphilis has always been higher in the public subsector, ranging from 1.3 to 7.1, while in the private subsector, the values range from 0.2 to 0.6.

Conclusions:

The difference in these perinatal health indicators between the two healthcare subsectors in our country reflects that despite having an Integrated National Health System, there is a disparity that impacts the results of final and intermediate indicators, thus determining the existence of reproductive injustice.

Keywords : Sexual and reproductive health; Reproductive justice; Perinatal outcomes.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )