Serviços Personalizados
Journal
Artigo
Links relacionados
Compartilhar
Odontoestomatología
versão impressa ISSN 0797-0374versão On-line ISSN 1688-9339
Odontoestomatología vol.23 no.38 Montevideo 2021 Epub 30-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.22592/ode2021n37e501
Articles
Recognition for our 2020-2021 reviewers
1Departamento de Publicaciones. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de la República, Uruguay
The editorial process is the pillar that supports and shapes scientific journals. It is a complex process that involves receiving the manuscript according to the journal's standards, reviewing it, and publishing the final article. Peer review is the expert evaluation of manuscripts by two external referees that contribute to the editorial decision of accepting or rejecting the work. It is essential to select the right reviewers for the editorial team to improve the articles' quality and make the necessary modifications.
The editorial process requires the follow-up of the articles' life cycle. It also involves fluid communication with authors and referees to provide feedback on the relevant evaluations.
Accepting or rejecting a manuscript does not mean that it is of inferior quality. It often means that the work does not follow the scientific journal's guidelines, does not comply with specific ethical requirements, or is not considered original or novel in a widely explored topic.
All the articles are reviewed by two referees from the relevant area. A third referee is convened if the two original referees disagree. Care is taken so that foreign referees are assigned to an article with a Uruguayan author, and vice versa.
During this period, 43 articles were published out of 65 reviewed, resulting in a rejection rate of 33.8% and an acceptance rate of 66.3% (Chart 1). These rates are similar to the range of other journals in the area.1,2,3
Compared to the 2018-2019 period, the rejection rate was 20% after evaluated 50 articles.4
A total of 138 reviews were conducted by 97 referees from Latin America (table 1 and 2).
Country | Reviews conducted |
Argentina | 30 |
Brazil | 9 |
Chile | 23 |
Ecuador | 1 |
Mexico | 5 |
Panama | 1 |
Peru | 1 |
Dominican Republic | 1 |
Uruguay | 67 |
Total | 138 |
Country | N° |
Argentina | 22 |
Brazil | 6 |
Chile | 17 |
Ecuador | 1 |
Mexico | 5 |
Panama | 1 |
Peru | 1 |
Dominican Republic | 1 |
Uruguay | 43 |
Total | 97 |
Chart 2 shows an even gender distribution of reviewers: 58.2% were women and 41.8%, men.
In the following table, we acknowledge and thank the referees who have worked on the articles.
Reviewers | Country |
---|---|
Actis, Adriana | Argentina |
Alcántara, Raúl | Chile |
Álvarez, Licet | Uruguay |
Andrade, Ernesto | Uruguay |
Añaña, Nelly | Uruguay |
Araya, Carlos | Chile |
Arriagada, María | Chile |
Arriagada, Verónica | Chile |
Artaza, Liliana | Argentina |
Badanian, Andrea | Uruguay |
Beovide, Verónica | Uruguay |
Biondi, Ana | Argentina |
Blanco, Verónica | Uruguay |
Bologna, Ronell | Uruguay |
Bonecker, Marcelo | Brazil |
Borgia, Ernesto | Uruguay |
Bueno, Luis | Uruguay |
Cabrera, Carlos | Uruguay |
Cantero, Cecilia | Chile |
Casamayou, Martha | Uruguay |
Caviglia, Inés | Uruguay |
Cosetti, Laura | Uruguay |
Cubillos, Paulina | Chile |
Cuevas Suárez, Carlos | Brazil |
Díaz, Alejandro | Chile |
Dreyer, Erik | Chile |
Espinosa, Leon | Mexico |
Fernández, Claudia | Argentina |
Fierromonti, Claudia | Chile |
Figueiredo, Marcia Cançado | Brazil |
Flores, Homero | Chile |
Fontanetti, Pablo | Argentina |
Francia, Alejandro | Uruguay |
Funosas, Esteban | Argentina |
Galiana, Beatriz | Argentina |
Garay, Fernando | Uruguay |
Garchitorena, María Inés | Uruguay |
García, Andrés | Uruguay |
García, Graciela | Uruguay |
Gigena, Pablo | Argentina |
Gonzalez, Rogelio | Mexico |
Grassi, Annabel | Uruguay |
Grazioli, Guillermo | Uruguay |
Gugelmeier, Virginia | Uruguay |
Hermida, Laura | Uruguay |
Herrero, Cynthia | Argentina |
Inostroza, Carolina | Chile |
Jasa, Gainer | Uruguay |
Kaplan, Andrea | Argentina |
Kreiner, Marcelo | Uruguay |
López Jordi, María del Carmen | Uruguay |
Mandalunis, Patricia | Argentina |
Martinelli, Sylvia | Uruguay |
Martins, Manuela | Brazil |
Masoli, Carla | Argentina |
Mateu, María Eugenia | Argentina |
Molgatini, Susana | Argentina |
Molina, Gustavo | Argentina |
Moran, María | Chile |
Moran, María Paz | Chile |
Muñoz, Helmuth | Chile |
Obelli, Juan José | Argentina |
Oliva, Ricardo | Mexico |
Oyarce, Carmen | Chile |
Palacios, Silvia | Argentina |
Pareja, Carmen | Peru |
Perez Eka | Panama |
Picapedra, Alicia | Uruguay |
Picca, Mariana | Argentina |
Pisterna, Gabriela | Argentina |
Puig, Germán | Uruguay |
Raffo, Marisa | Uruguay |
Reyes, Ariel | Dominican Republic |
Riva, Raúl | Uruguay |
Rivas Carlos | Chile |
Rodríguez, Ismael | Argentina |
Rodríguez, María Fernanda | Uruguay |
Romero, René | Uruguay |
Russo, Ana Laura | Uruguay |
Sacoto, Fernanda | Ecuador |
Salveraglio, Inés | Uruguay |
Samar, María Elena | Argentina |
Sánchez, Celeste | Mexico |
Scarrone, Marcelo | Uruguay |
Sicco, Estefanía | Uruguay |
Silva, Rhonan | Brazil |
Silveira, Felipe Martins | Brazil |
Szwarc, Esther | Uruguay |
Taramaso, Fernando | Uruguay |
Valenzuela, Cecilia | Uruguay |
Valez, Valeria | Uruguay |
Vázquez, Susana | Uruguay |
Verdera, Sergio | Uruguay |
Villanueva, Francisco | Mexico |
Vuoto, Elena | Argentina |
Wendler, Michael | Chile |
Zepedeo, Martín | Uruguay |
Referencias
1. Acta Odontológica Colombiana. Instrucciones a los autores. Disponible en: http://www.unal.edu.co) [ Links ]
2. Revista KIRU. Instrucciones a los autores. Disponible en:https://www.aulavirtualusmp.pe/ojs/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/about/editorialPolicies [ Links ]
3. Revista de Odontopediatría Latinoamericana. Instrucciones a los autores. Disponible en: https://www.revistaodontopediatria.org/index.php/alop/information/authors [ Links ]
4. Lopez Jordi MC, Piovesan S, Pereira V, Patrón C, Lima A. Proceso de arbitraje para la calidad de las revistas científicas. Odontoestomatología 2019; 21(34) [ Links ]